Home › Forums › Community & Miscellaneous › Another Flicking Channels video
- This topic has 23 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 2 weeks, 1 day ago by
Gary.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
11th June 2026 at 9:52 pm #2945
-
12th June 2026 at 8:34 am #2948
-
15th June 2026 at 9:11 pm #3012::
I know these have faced mixed responses but I’m going to keep posting them until they’re all used up. They were fun to create, especially the humorous clip and I’m sure it would have been amazing to create much longer clips with full nudity had that been financially viable.
-
17th June 2026 at 4:31 pm #3015
-
18th June 2026 at 10:32 am #3020
-
18th June 2026 at 12:23 pm #3023
-
19th June 2026 at 2:19 pm #3027
-
21st June 2026 at 9:28 pm #3068
-
5th August 2026 at 4:49 pm #3670::
Just done another, deeper test. If I upload any photo involving even slight nudity, Pollo rejects it – doesn’t matter what model I’m using.
I’ve tried starting with a Safe-for-work photo leading to an SFW video and that works. However, even a hint of an NSFW outcome (any nudity/partial nudity at all) and it’s rejected. My models of choice are Pollo 2.0 and Pollo 2.5 but they reject just as readily as the others I tried.
-
21st June 2026 at 10:21 pm #3069
-
-
18th June 2026 at 11:00 am #3021
-
5th August 2026 at 6:27 pm #3679::
Pollo (text to video, pollo 2.5) still seems to be accepting naked uploads for me. But this isnāt the age restricted area so I canāt post the example here.
-
5th August 2026 at 6:29 pm #3681::
Or in case the above link doesn’t work, try https://nakedexperiment.com/forums/topic/pollo-still-working-for-me/#post-3671
-
9th August 2026 at 10:32 pm #3704::
I’m still collecting these videos – not sure what to do with them.
I can’t produce videos with sound much anymore since Grok locked down, HF stopped supporting sound and Pollo went funny. Qwen still works but the sound quality is hugely variable. I find, often, the first video of the day has good sound, but any further ones are tinny and crackly.
-
12th August 2026 at 9:09 am #3768::
There seems to be a pattern that the sound quality on Qwen videos gets worse during the day, but is better in the morning. I’m guessing that’s related to how busy their servers are? Anyone got any experience of this?
There’s no point wasting my daily allowance on crappy sound quality.
-
12th August 2026 at 7:16 pm #3782::
Iāve not tried any videos on pollo with sound so far. I think last time I looked, I didnāt find a model that supported sound. Looking again now, I found a sound option in pollo 2.5 and discovered it comes in two levels: Basic for 28 credits āFast generation with standard qualityā, pro for 100 credits āProfessional, cinema-quality outputā.
That might make sense if we could refine prompts with the Basic setting and be guaranteed that re-running the same prompt with the Pro setting would generate exactly the same video but at the higher quality level. But my suspicion is that the pro setting is likely to start again from scratch and throw in a few random differences that might prove to be just a waste of extra credits.
-
-
12th August 2026 at 7:07 am #3766
-
12th August 2026 at 3:05 pm #3778::
I wish I could use these to promote the community.
Obviously, it would be best if it was video clips of members being naked in various places and situations, but that’s a minefield, would be 90% male (which doesn’t market well on social media) and, situation wise, I think we’d struggle to come close to the variety.
It would be great if I could put the non-nude versions on YouTube but they have strict rules against using YouTube to promote other sites.
-
20th August 2026 at 4:15 pm #3819::
It seems Qwen has tightened its detection to the point where it false-posits almost every time, rendering it unusable. It just told me that the nudity in this photo is worthy of a “security warning” and says “The input image data may contain inappropriate content.”

Pollo rejects it too.
-
7th September 2026 at 6:25 pm #3899::
The way the AI world is developing, I think the golden age is already past.
I need to set up a new desktop PC with huge memory and a couple of seriously powerful graphics cards so I can do the processing at home. It would be a lot slower but unlimited and unrestricted.
-
8th September 2026 at 9:20 am #3902::
It’s a different view from the inside.
From the late 80’s through to early 2000’s it was gaming demand that drove the increase in PC requirements (RAM, Processor, and Graphics cards) because the big, new games needed just a bit more than was currently around.
That changed with the uptake of gaming consoles and games had to fit into what the consoles provided, so there was a much reduced demand for newer, bigger PCs.
Your use of AI is a fraction of what AI covers,Ā but your choice is either use restricted cloud services or get a massive upgrade on your PC and do it at home
Couple this with a huge demand for RAM and Processors in those same AI Cloud services, plus Cloud storage and Processing means there’s a shortage of PC Chips that is raising the price because the manufacturers are focusing on supplying the Cloud data centres.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.