- This topic has 8 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 1 week ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
-
It’s very moderated. I’ve got from a (ahem) clothed starter photo to underwear to some suggestive moves, and that took several runs at it to undderstand the correct phrasing to use.
-
-
It seems that the resistance to nudity jumped upwards significantly in the past few days. It’s hard to be sure (I could just be unlucky recently) but I’m definitely wasting my limited credits on failed attempts. One 6-second clip has so far gone 11 attempts without success, leaving me with insufficient credits to complete the whole video this month (and probably not next month). The most common outcome is extra clothing appearing (that hasn’t happened in months) or bizarre unrealistic animation where limbs or spines rotate impossibly.
I’m going to give it a break – see if things improve.
-
I read your previous post about not being able to generate male nudity.
Pollo 2.0 let me try a sequel to the police raid where the men got naked too. Pollo 2.5 just gave a message saying the third party service wasn’t working. That might be due to censorship within the third party, whoever that may be, or it might simply be temporarily out of order.
I don’t think I can upload a video even in the age restricted area (without it first being hosted somewhere external) but I’ll try uploading a screen grab of the final frame there.
-
Pollo 2.5 seems good with female nudity but I’m having huge problems getting to follow instructions. It feels like it deliberately finds a new and small way to completely ruin each clip.
I’m trying to build a longer video with 2 female TV presenters and an audience in a studio. First it insisted on adding huge headsets to the presenters, then it would make the audience look anywhere except at the presenters. For one clip the presenters suddenly developed west country accents, then one of them took of a bra and had it immediately turn into a large sheet as she dropped it on the stage. An attempt to make the audience clap in response to something the presenter said resulted in the audience repeating the same words in unison. I’ve also had one presenter morph into two, one the presenters change hair colour mid 5-second clip and remove a bra to reveal a denim t-shirt “underneath”. It’s been very costly on credits.
I’ve also had the “third party service report inappropriate content” error when the presenters were simply introducing themselves, but not when clothes were removed. It’s very inconsistent and I’ve now run out of credits.
-
I just spent my last credits trying to get Pollo 2.5 to produce a scene from a starting picture. Yet again it seems to be deliberately buggering it up. I got dialogue produced perfectly except both times the opposite person said each line, which makes zero sense, and an item of clothing which I prompted as being pushed down her legs both times was stretched comedically upwards leaving an identical item of clothing in its place.
Also, I’m finding it really hard to work without being able to set an end frame. It’s SO much more cost-effective and reliable to be able to set a start frame and an end frame.
-
-
I’m giving up for a while. I’m just getting hilarious results across several generators. Even using HuggingFace with the old reliable Wan 2.2 (with start + end frames) is acting up, largely ignoring prompts and doing its own mad things which don’t even end on the “end” frame. I don’t know what’s going on.
-
Hmmm… odd. Wan 2.2 seems to be open to nudity and sensible movement again, but the image quality has dropped markedly. I wish I could get more affordable access to Wan 2.5/2.6. And end frames on it. That would be great.
-
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.